Diaphonic pluralism: from truth pluralism to disagreement pluralism
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract In this paper, I offer a pluralistic framework for disagreement and develop strategy to account the varieties of on basis truth across different domains discourse. Truth-pluralism is thus sufficient delivering pluralism about disagreement—that is, diaphonic pluralism.
منابع مشابه
Methodological pluralism and pluralism of method
The only uses of this work permitted are private study or research.
متن کاملTruth in Mathematics: The Question of Pluralism∗
The discovery of non-Euclidean geometries (in the 19 century) undermined the claim that Euclidean geometry is the one true geometry and instead led to a plurality of geometries no one of which could be said (without qualification) to be “truer” than the others. In a similar spirit many have claimed that the discovery of independence results for arithmetic and set theory (in the 20 century) has ...
متن کاملLogical Pluralism
A widespread assumption in contemporary philosophy of logic is that there is one true logic, that there is one and only one correct answer as to whether a given argument is deductively valid. In this paper we propose an alternative view, logical pluralism. According to logical pluralism there is not one true logic; there are many. There is not always a single answer to the question “is this arg...
متن کاملNeo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Synthese
سال: 2022
ISSN: ['0039-7857', '1573-0964']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03852-2